CHECKID · ARCHITECTURE

Technical Due-Diligence Pack

Entry point for RFI/RFP, architecture review, security assessment and procurement.

TECHNICAL REFERENCE

Technical Due-Diligence Pack

Entry point for RFI/RFP, architecture review, security assessment and procurement.

Product Architecture

System landscape, proofing, document/eID, biometrics, policy/assurance and evidence.

Security Review

Authentication contract, PAD scope, attack layers and publication limitations for transport/key/tenant controls.

Deployment & NFR

Support models, responsibility matrix and contract-defined availability/DR/scale.

Developer Contract

Token/subject/process/perform/status, errors and explicit webhook limitations.

Trust Evidence

Certificate basis remains distinct from current standards; Public Evidence Register preserves scope/exclusions.

Known Limitations

Benchmarks, webhooks, legal retention and device test profiles are not complete until primary sources exist.

TECHNICAL DUE-DILIGENCE INDEX

Public, contractual, NDA and not published — make the boundary explicit

The Due-Diligence Pack lets procurement and CTO teams see what evidence is public and what requires contract/NDA access when the artefact actually exists.

Domain Public Contract/NDA boundary Current position
Architecture Architecture Center Deployment-specific topology Public system/trust-boundary model
Security Public boundary + certificate scope Control detail if approved pack exists No invented TLS/HSM/isolation
API CheckID API contract V1.2.260123/OpenAPI Partner/customer classified access OAuth2 current; legacy auth separated
SDK Architecture overview Release/method contract Child docs consolidated
NFR/SLA Boundary model Approved NFR/SLA/deployment artefact No invented RTO/RPO/TPS
Biometrics Architecture/standards/methodology Benchmark/test report No context-free accuracy
Devices Manufacturer-sourced capability Mobile-ID tested matrix Datasheet ≠ compatibility
Privacy/legal Informational data-governance overview Effective Legal/DPO notice/contract No pseudo-policy completeness